SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Moto.wieszjak.pl - nowy wortal motoryzacyjny na rynku stawia na porady
Nowa witryna oferuje użytkownikom przegląd wiadomości z rynku motoryzacyjnego, testy aut nowych i używanych, liczne porady prawne i eksploatacyjne dla kierowców, moto-forum, niezbędnik oraz newsletter dla zmotoryzowanych.

 

169127534508_553460007928Mark Fasheh
On Sep 10, 2008 11:46 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:49:34 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx wrote: The following patches are the latest attempt at implementing a

 
194328374217_501860007084Mark Fasheh
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxx Any block based fs (this patch includes ext3) just has to declare its own fiemap() function and then call this generic function with its own get_block_t. Thi

 
191421934484_586060007678Andreas Dilger
Hi, This is the implementation for large EA support in ext4. Note that this also helps to have a larger number of EAs since large EAs get written out to a new inode instead of the EA block. If valu

 
143729184246_579360007885Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-25一的 16:47 -0600,Andreas Dilger写道: On Aug 25, 2008 21:30 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: This is the implementation for large EA support i

 
118927914252_570160007869Andreas Dilger
Hi, This is the implementation for large EA support in ext4. Note that this also helps to have a larger number of EAs since large EAs get written out to a new inode instead of the EA block. If valu

 
147320784622_598260007575Aneesh Kumar KV
With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure (ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This

 
190925564411_512560007942Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-25一的 16:47 -0600,Andreas Dilger写道: On Aug 25, 2008 21:30 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: This is the implementation for large EA support i

 
121024894135_569460007405Aneesh Kumar KV
This patch add dirty block accounting using percpu_counters. Delayed allocation block reservation is now done by updating dirty block counter. In the later patch we switch to non delalloc mode if the

 
137127864322_561860007748Aneesh Kumar KV
With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure (ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This

 
150227684538_575560007927Aneesh Kumar KV
This patch add dirty block accounting using percpu_counters. Delayed allocation block reservation is now done by updating dirty block counter. In the later patch we switch to non delalloc mode if the

 
162329434005_524560007618Akira Fujita
Otherwise we skip group 0 during block allocation. This cause ENOSPC even if we have free blocks in group 0. This should be merged with defrag. The expected_group changes are introduced by defrag pat

 
182028324173_523160007748Akira Fujita
Otherwise we skip group 0 during block allocation. This cause ENOSPC even if we have free blocks in group 0. This should be merged with defrag. The expected_group changes are introduced by defrag pat

 
117321674236_530860007585Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: delayed allocation allocate blocks during writepages. That also means we cannot handle block alloc

 
171322324371_503560007949Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: delayed allocation allocate blocks during writepages. That also means we cannot handle block alloc

 
178323524717_532160007186Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: During block reservation if we dont have enough blocks left, retry block reservation with smaller

 
124727304128_525360007051Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: During block reservation if we dont have enough blocks left, retry block reservation with smaller

 
187127954883_504460007841Aneesh Kumar KV
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 which changed the type from long to s6

 
179321994007_502960007869Aneesh Kumar KV
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 which changed the type from long to s6

 
161522194101_598660007952Andreas Dilger
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:27:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: @@ -

 
193520374304_565260007410Andreas Dilger
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:27:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: @@ -

 
183826074140_596660007115Manish Katiyar
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:50:28 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da474408

 
101627314910_590060007936Manish Katiyar
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:50:28 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da474408

 
174125684134_574860007642Theodore Tso
Close the filehandle and return in case if we are unable to expand the directory during write. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- debugfs/debugfs.c | 1 + 1 f

 
161722124861_571960007115Theodore Tso
Close the filehandle and return in case if we are unable to expand the directory during write. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- debugfs/debugfs.c | 1 + 1 f

 
167121324153_597660007512Theodore Tso
Below patch ensures that cleanup is done properly in ext2fs_initialize from all return paths in case of errors. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- lib/ext2fs/ini

 
138526214118_552560007978Theodore Tso
Below patch ensures that cleanup is done properly in ext2fs_initialize from all return paths in case of errors. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- lib/ext2fs/ini

 
164126044709_555060007483Theodore Tso
Ted, I was not sure if I should change it to EXT2_OBSO_OS_MASIX as it is currently defined in ext2_fs.h. Let me know if you think that is the correct way to fix it, will redo the patch. Compilation

 
148622434051_562060007649Theodore Tso
Ted, I was not sure if I should change it to EXT2_OBSO_OS_MASIX as it is currently defined in ext2_fs.h. Let me know if you think that is the correct way to fix it, will redo the patch. Compilation

 
126126094861_512260007058Christoph Hellwig
Hi Linus, Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git for_linus This patch series contains a number of bug fixes that fixes various BUG() crashes discove

 
123830004191_539160007976Aneesh Kumar KV
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:44:39PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: ext4: Initialize writeback_index to 0 when allocating a new inode Since commit 7d455e0030eeab820773e7786605be4d9e56a0

 
190423594597_502160007183Aneesh Kumar KV
percpu_counter_sum_and_sub(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount) This will be later used by ext4 code. It adds up the local per cpu counter values to global count and subtract amount from the gloa

 
200025254787_570860007290Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-22五的 19:04 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them

 
119125614534_524260007526Peter Zijlstra
在 2008-08-22五的 19:04 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 wh

 
189224434134_575360007463Hidehiro Kawai
The patch titled ext4: dont try to resize if there are no reserved gdt blocks left has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ext4-dont-try-to-resize-if-there-are-no-reserved-gd

 
181228034462_500260007436Rishikesh K Rajak
Hello, On Thu 21-08-08 19:09:27, Hidehiro Kawai wrote: The patch titled jbd: fix error handling for checkpoint io has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is jbd-fix

 
197820974796_557460007681Eric Sandeen
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:12:52PM +0530, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: Wanted to know if anyone is getting the same problem too. rel="nofollow" bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11389 b

 
175821184205_554460007281Mingming Cao
(oops, left off the s390 list on the first send) The following changes get ext4 on s390 up and running for me. the switch from ffs to __ffs changes where we start counting (if the first bit is set,

 
183420174842_536760007023Jose R Santos
The following series of patches implement API call needed to handle 64-bit block numbers. Im concentrating mainly in providing the API call first and if the interfaces are sane, we can go ahead and

 
189321524466_502760007031Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Use blk64_t for blocks in struct ext2_file. The ext2_file structure is never exposed through the libext2fs API so it is safe to use 64-bit blocks for blockn

 
149027164834_595260007028Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add ext2_off64_t type. The ext2_off_t is u32. Creating a new 64-bit ext2_off64_t for 64bit offsets. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx --

 
138726964125_518360007245Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit dirblock interface. Add new ext2fs_(read|write)_dir_block3() routines that take blk64_t as an input. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxx

 
186420274364_506860007190Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit alloc interface. Add new ext2fs_new_block2(), ext2fs_get_free_blocks2() and ext2fs_alloc_block2() that take and return blk64_t. Signed-off-by: J

 
135024054208_519260007469Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Use new ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2 call in libext2fs. The new ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2() function has some changes aside from just blk64_t support. Lets ma

 
121526654621_568160007525Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit getsize interface. Added interface capable of opening 64-bit block device. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx -- lib/ext2fs/ext

 
171321824240_554660007959Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit mkjournal.c interface Added 64-bit mkjournal.c interface. Needed to zero inode tables. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx -- l

 
157525224655_570160007925Aneesh Kumar KV
Hi, I am getting this even with the latest patch queue. The test program is a modified fsstress with fallocate support. mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed for inode 377954 at logical offse

 
194625684953_530960007524Aneesh Kumar KV
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed for inode 323784 at logical offset 313 with max blocks 11 with error -28 This

 
150029874929_570860007702Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-20三的 23:57 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:53:31AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM

 
117623944367_579760007059Theodore Tso
On Aug 20, 2008 07:53 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: Also, this is one of the places where it might help if we did something like: freeblocks = percpu_counter_read(&sbi- s_freeblocks_count

 
132127884242_556260007376Theodore Tso
在 2008-08-20三的 07:53 -0400,Theodore Tso写道: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: mpage_da_map_blocks block alloca